Coverability, Termination, and Finiteness in Recursive Petri Nets
Alain Finkel, Serge Haddad, Igor Khmelnitsky

TL;DR
This paper proves that key problems in Recursive Petri nets are EXPSPACE-complete, matching Petri nets, and shows they are more expressive than Petri nets and context-free languages.
Contribution
It establishes complexity bounds for Recursive Petri nets' coverability, termination, boundedness, and finiteness problems, and demonstrates their increased expressiveness.
Findings
Problems are EXPSPACE-complete, same as Petri nets.
Coverability languages strictly include Petri net and context-free languages.
Recursive Petri nets are more expressive than Petri nets.
Abstract
In the early two-thousands, Recursive Petri nets have been introduced in order to model distributed planning of multi-agent systems for which counters and recursivity were necessary. Although Recursive Petri nets strictly extend Petri nets and context-free grammars, most of the usual problems (reachability, coverability, finiteness, boundedness and termination) were known to be solvable by using non-primitive recursive algorithms. For almost all other extended Petri nets models containing a stack, the complexity of coverability and termination are unknown or strictly larger than EXPSPACE. In contrast, we establish here that for Recursive Petri nets, the coverability, termination, boundedness and finiteness problems are EXPSPACE-complete as for Petri nets. From an expressiveness point of view, we show that coverability languages of Recursive Petri nets strictly include the union of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPetri Nets in System Modeling · Mobile Agent-Based Network Management · Business Process Modeling and Analysis
