Choosing the Right Algorithm With Hints From Complexity Theory
Shouda Wang, Weijie Zheng, Benjamin Doerr

TL;DR
This paper uses complexity theory insights to guide the selection of optimization algorithms, demonstrating that the Metropolis algorithm and sig-cGA are highly effective for the DLB benchmark, outperforming traditional methods.
Contribution
It introduces a complexity-theoretic approach to algorithm selection, proving the effectiveness of the Metropolis algorithm and sig-cGA for the DLB problem, and establishes runtime bounds for various algorithms.
Findings
Metropolis algorithm solves DLB in quadratic time
sig-cGA solves DLB in O(n log n) time with high probability
Metropolis outperforms other algorithms on the DLB benchmark
Abstract
Choosing a suitable algorithm from the myriads of different search heuristics is difficult when faced with a novel optimization problem. In this work, we argue that the purely academic question of what could be the best possible algorithm in a certain broad class of black-box optimizers can give fruitful indications in which direction to search for good established optimization heuristics. We demonstrate this approach on the recently proposed DLB benchmark, for which the only known results are runtimes for several classic evolutionary algorithms and an runtime for an estimation-of-distribution algorithm. Our finding that the unary unbiased black-box complexity is only suggests the Metropolis algorithm as an interesting candidate and we prove that it solves the DLB problem in quadratic time. Since we also prove that better runtimes cannot be obtained in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
