The probabilistic vs the quantization approach to K\"ahler-Einstein geometry
Robert J. Berman

TL;DR
This paper compares probabilistic and quantization methods for constructing K"ahler-Einstein metrics, providing new bounds and proofs that connect stability conditions with metric existence.
Contribution
It introduces a new quantitative bound on the partition function and offers a direct analytic proof linking Gibbs stability to the existence of K"ahler-Einstein metrics.
Findings
New bound on the partition function
Analytic proof of existence under Gibbs stability
Connection between probabilistic and quantization approaches
Abstract
In the probabilistic construction of K\"ahler-Einstein metrics on a complex projective algebraic manifold X - involving random point processes on X - a key role is played by the partition function. In this work a new quantitative bound on the partition function is obtained. It yields, in particular, a new direct analytic proof that X admits a K\"ahler-Einstein metrics if it is uniformly Gibbs stable. The proof makes contact with the quantization approach to K\"ahler-Einstein geometry.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometry and complex manifolds · Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows · Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
