A non-existence result for the $L_p$-Minkowski problem
Christos Saroglou

TL;DR
The paper proves that certain measures concentrated on subspaces cannot be realized as $L_p$-surface area measures of convex bodies for $p<1$, disproving a prior conjecture in the field.
Contribution
It establishes a non-existence result for the $L_p$-Minkowski problem when $p<1$, specifically for measures supported on subspaces, challenging previous assumptions.
Findings
Certain measures are not $L_p$-surface area measures for $p<1$
Disproves a conjecture from prior literature
Advances understanding of the $L_p$-Minkowski problem
Abstract
We show that given a real number , a positive integer and a proper subspace of , the measure on the Euclidean sphere , which is concentrated in and whose restriction to the class of Borel subsets of equals the spherical Lebesgue measure on , is not the -surface area measure of any convex body. This, in particular, disproves a conjecture from [Bianchi, B\"or\"oczky, Colesanti, Yang, The -Minkowski problem for , Adv. Math. (2019)].
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPoint processes and geometric inequalities · Morphological variations and asymmetry
