The Three-Sided PyramidWavefront Sensor. I. Simulations and Analysis for Astronomical Adaptive Optics

TL;DR

This paper introduces a three-sided pyramid wavefront sensor (3PWFS) for astronomical adaptive optics, demonstrating through simulations that it performs comparably or better than the traditional four-sided PWFS, especially with high read-noise detectors.

Contribution

The study develops a mathematical formalism for the 3PWFS and compares its performance to the 4PWFS, showing its viability and advantages in high read-noise conditions.

Findings

3PWFS achieves similar Strehl ratios to 4PWFS with low read noise.

3PWFS outperforms 4PWFS in high read-noise scenarios, with a Strehl gain of 0.036.

3PWFS can fully reconstruct wavefronts and maintain stable closed-loop correction.

Abstract

For ExAO instruments for the Giant Segmented Mirror Telescopes (GSMTs), alternative architectures of WFS are under consideration because there is a tradeoff between detector size, speed, and noise that reduces the performance of GSMT-ExAO wavefront control. One option under consideration for a GSMT-ExAO wavefront sensor is a three-sided PWFS (3PWFS). The 3PWFS creates three copies of the telescope pupil for wavefront sensing, compared to the conventional four-sided PWFS (4PWFS) which uses four pupils. The 3PWFS uses fewer detector pixels than the 4PWFS and should therefore be less sensitive to read noise. Here we develop a mathematical formalism based on the diffraction theory description of the Foucault knife edge test that predicts the intensity pattern after the PWFS. Our formalism allows us to calculate the intensity in the pupil images formed by the PWFS in the presence of phase errors corresponding to arbitrary Fourier modes. We then use the Object Oriented MATLAB Adaptive Optics toolbox (OOMAO) to simulate an end-to-end model of an adaptive optics system using a PWFS with modulation and compare the performance of the 3PWFS to the 4PWFS. In the case of a low read noise detector, the Strehl ratios of the 3PWFS and 4PWFS are within 0.01. When we included higher read noise in the simulation, we found a Strehl ratio gain of 0.036 for the 3PWFS using Raw Intensity over the 4PWFS using Slopes Maps at a stellar magnitude of 10. At the same magnitude, the 4PWFS RI also outperformed the 4PWFS SM, but the gain was only 0.012 Strehl. This is significant because 4PWFS using Slopes Maps is how the PWFS is conventionally used for AO wavefront sensing. We have found that the 3PWFS is a viable wavefront sensor that can fully reconstruct a wavefront and produce a stable closed-loop with correction comparable to that of a 4PWFS, with modestly better performance for high read-noise detectors.