Are Group Acknowledgements Worth Anything in IEEE 802.15.4 DSME: A Comparative Analysis

TL;DR

This paper compares various group acknowledgment schemes in IEEE 802.15.4 DSME for IoT data collection, finding that most do not outperform direct acknowledgments in reliability and energy efficiency.

Contribution

It introduces a novel group acknowledgment scheme and provides a comprehensive comparison with existing methods in the context of IoT networks.

Findings

Most group acknowledgment schemes are not viable alternatives to direct acknowledgments.

The proposed scheme offers limited improvements in energy efficiency and reliability.

Direct acknowledgments remain preferable in most scenarios.

Abstract

For data collection scenarios in the Industrial Internet of Things, wireless communication provides a cost-effective and easy-to-deploy alternative to wired networks. The main focus lies on energy efficiency and reliability, as many devices are battery operated. IEEE 802.15.4 DSME enhances reliability by acknowledging each packet individually, imposing an overhead for each transmitted packet, and increasing energy consumption. In networks with little interference, it may be beneficial to aggregate the acknowledgments for multiple nodes and broadcast them in a compressed format to all nodes in the neighborhood. The IEEE 802.15.4 2012 standard describes such a group acknowledgment scheme which, however, disappears in later iterations of the standard. This paper compares different group acknowledgment schemes and proposes a novel group acknowledgment scheme with the goal to examine whether group acknowledgments constitute a viable alternative to regular acknowledgments in reliable data-collection scenarios. Our analysis suggests that apart from a few cases, GACKs do not constitute a valid alternative to the direct acknowledgement of data packets.