Categories of graphs for operadic structures
Philip Hackney

TL;DR
This paper reviews various graph categories used in describing homotopy-coherent operads, introduces uniform morphism definitions, and demonstrates how certain adjunctions between operad categories can be realized at the presheaf level.
Contribution
It provides new, uniform definitions for morphisms in graph categories related to operads and shows how to realize key adjunctions at the presheaf level.
Findings
Uniform definitions for morphisms in graph categories
Comparison of categories of generalized operads
Realization of adjunctions at the presheaf level
Abstract
We recall several categories of graphs which are useful for describing homotopy-coherent versions of generalized operads (e.g. cyclic operads, modular operads, properads, and so on), and give new, uniform definitions for their morphisms. This allows for straightforward comparisons, and we use this to show that certain free-forgetful adjunctions between categories of generalized operads can be realized at the level of presheaves. This includes adjunctions between operads and cyclic operads, between dioperads and augmented cyclic operads, and betweeen wheeled properads and modular operads.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topics in Algebra · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
