Remeasuring the anomalously enhanced $B(E2; 2^+ \rightarrow 1^+)$ in $^8\mathrm{Li}$
S. L. Henderson, T. Ahn, P. J. Fasano, A. E. McCoy, S. Aguilar, D. T., Blankstein, L. Caves, A. C. Dombos, R. K. Grzywacz, K. L. Jones, S. Jin, R., Kelmar, J. J. Kolata, P. D. O'Malley, C. S. Reingold, A. Simon, K. Smith

TL;DR
This paper remeasures the $B(E2; 2^+ ightarrow 1^+)$ transition strength in $^8$Li using improved methods, finding a value lower than previous reports but still unusually high compared to theoretical predictions.
Contribution
The study provides a revised measurement of the $B(E2)$ strength in $^8$Li, clarifying discrepancies with prior data and theoretical models.
Findings
Revised $B(E2)$ value of 19(^{+7}_{-6})(2) e^2fm^4 in $^8$Li
The new measurement is about three times smaller than previous reports
The $B(E2)$ strength remains anomalously high compared to models.
Abstract
The large reported strength between the ground state and first excited state of , , presents a puzzle. Unlike in neighboring isotopes, where enhanced strengths may be understood to arise from deformation as rotational in-band transitions, the transition in Li cannot be understood in any simple way as a rotational in-band transition. Moreover, the reported strength exceeds \textit{ab initio} predictions by an order of magnitude. In light of this discrepancy, we revisited the Coulomb excitation measurement of this strength, now using particle- coincidences, yielding a revised of ~efm. We explore how this value compares to what might be expected in the limits of rotational models. While the present value…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAtomic and Molecular Physics · Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates · Nuclear physics research studies
