Spanning Tree Bounds for Grid Graphs
Kristopher Tapp

TL;DR
This paper establishes inequalities relating boundary size and the number of spanning trees in subgraphs of grid graphs, with applications to measuring district map compactness.
Contribution
It introduces new inequalities connecting boundary size and spanning tree counts in grid subgraphs, linking graph theory to district compactness measures.
Findings
Smaller boundary subgraphs have more spanning trees.
Larger boundary subgraphs have fewer spanning trees.
Application to district map compactness metrics.
Abstract
Among subgraphs with a fixed number of vertices of the regular square lattice, we prove inequalities that essentially say that those with smaller boundaries have larger numbers of spanning trees and vice-versa. As an application, we relate two commonly used measurements of the compactness of district maps.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopological and Geometric Data Analysis · Advanced Graph Theory Research · Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation
