Truthful and Fair Mechanisms for Matroid-Rank Valuations
Siddharth Barman, Paritosh Verma

TL;DR
This paper investigates fair division mechanisms for indivisible goods with strategic agents having matroid-rank valuations, establishing positive results for envy-freeness up to one good and negative results for maximin share fairness.
Contribution
It proves group strategy-proofness of a Pareto-efficient mechanism for EF1 and shows the non-existence of truthful, Pareto-efficient, MMS mechanisms for matroid-rank valuations.
Findings
Group strategy-proofness for EF1 allocations under matroid-rank valuations.
Impossibility of truthful, Pareto-efficient, MMS mechanisms for matroid-rank valuations.
Characterization of truthful mechanisms for matroid-rank and binary XOS valuations.
Abstract
We study the problem of allocating indivisible goods among strategic agents. We focus on settings wherein monetary transfers are not available and each agent's private valuation is a submodular function with binary marginals, i.e., the agents' valuations are matroid-rank functions. In this setup, we establish a notable dichotomy between two of the most well-studied fairness notions in discrete fair division; specifically, between envy-freeness up to one good (EF1) and maximin shares (MMS). First, we show that a Pareto-efficient mechanism of Babaioff et al. (2021) is group strategy-proof for finding EF1 allocations, under matroid-rank valuations. The group strategy-proofness guarantee strengthens the result of Babaioff et al. (2021), that establishes truthfulness (individually for each agent) in the same context. Our result also generalizes a work of Halpern et al. (2020), from binary…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Voting Systems · Economic theories and models · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
