Follow the guides: disentangling human and algorithmic curation in online music consumption
Quentin Villermet, J\'er\'emie Poiroux, Manuel Moussallam, Thomas, Louail, Camille Roth

TL;DR
This study analyzes how different user attitudes towards guidance influence diversity in music streaming, revealing that recommendation effects vary by user type and content, challenging the idea of uniform filter bubbles.
Contribution
It introduces a user categorization based on access modes and examines how algorithmic and editorial recommendations differently impact content diversity across user types.
Findings
User attitudes significantly influence consumption diversity.
Recommendation effects on diversity depend on user categories.
Radio programming often favors less popular artists despite higher repetition.
Abstract
The role of recommendation systems in the diversity of content consumption on platforms is a much-debated issue. The quantitative state of the art often overlooks the existence of individual attitudes toward guidance, and eventually of different categories of users in this regard. Focusing on the case of music streaming, we analyze the complete listening history of about 9k users over one year and demonstrate that there is no blanket answer to the intertwinement of recommendation use and consumption diversity: it depends on users. First we compute for each user the relative importance of different access modes within their listening history, introducing a trichotomy distinguishing so-called `organic' use from algorithmic and editorial guidance. We thereby identify four categories of users. We then focus on two scales related to content diversity, both in terms of dispersion -- how much…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
