TL;DR
This study evaluates machine learning approaches for enzyme-substrate specificity prediction, finding that simple models outperform complex compound-protein interaction models in family-wide enzyme screens, and proposes a new structure-based modeling strategy.
Contribution
The paper critically assesses existing CPI models for enzyme prediction and introduces a novel structure-based pooling method that improves predictive performance.
Findings
Current CPI models fail to learn meaningful interactions in enzyme family data.
No-interaction baseline models outperform CPI-based models in this context.
A new structure-based pooling approach enhances enzyme prediction accuracy.
Abstract
Biocatalysis is a promising approach to sustainably synthesize pharmaceuticals, complex natural products, and commodity chemicals at scale. However, the adoption of biocatalysis is limited by our ability to select enzymes that will catalyze their natural chemical transformation on non-natural substrates. While machine learning and in silico directed evolution are well-posed for this predictive modeling challenge, efforts to date have primarily aimed to increase activity against a single known substrate, rather than to identify enzymes capable of acting on new substrates of interest. To address this need, we curate 6 different high-quality enzyme family screens from the literature that each measure multiple enzymes against multiple substrates. We compare machine learning-based compound-protein interaction (CPI) modeling approaches from the literature used for predicting drug-target…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
