Non-Locality$\neq$Quantum Entanglement
Xingyu Guo, Chen-Te Ma

TL;DR
This paper challenges the assumption that quantum entanglement directly correlates with non-locality, showing through extended analysis that they are not equivalent, and proposes a new method for diagnosing entanglement.
Contribution
The paper introduces a generalized R-matrix for diagnosing quantum entanglement and demonstrates that entanglement and non-locality are not inherently equivalent.
Findings
Numerical results contradict the expectation that entanglement correlates with non-locality.
The generalized R-matrix restores the monotonic relationship between entanglement and non-locality.
Entanglement and non-locality are shown to be distinct phenomena.
Abstract
The unique entanglement measure is concurrence in a 2-qubit pure state. The maximum violation of Bell's inequality is monotonically increasing for this quantity. Therefore, people expect that pure state entanglement is relevant to the non-locality. For justification, we extend the study to three qubits. We consider all possible 3-qubit operators with a symmetric permutation. When only considering one entanglement measure, the numerical result contradicts expectation. Therefore, we conclude ``Non-LocalityQuantum Entanglement''. We propose the generalized -matrix or correlation matrix for the new diagnosis of Quantum Entanglement. We then demonstrate the evidence by restoring the monotonically increasing result.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Information and Cryptography · Quantum Mechanics and Applications · Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
