Is there a physical continuum?
Mate Csanad

TL;DR
This paper explores whether the physical world necessarily involves a continuum by modeling the brain and demonstrating that some physical quantities must be continuous under natural assumptions.
Contribution
It introduces a simple brain model to argue that a continuum is essential for certain physical quantities, challenging the idea that the universe could be purely discrete.
Findings
The continuum is necessary for some physical quantities.
A simple brain model supports the existence of a continuum.
Challenges the notion of a fully discrete physical universe.
Abstract
We are used to the fact that most if not all physical theories are based on the set of real numbers (or another associative division algebra). These all have a cardinality larger than that of the natural numbers, i.e. form a continuum. It is often asked, whether there really is a continuum in the physical world, or whether a future physical theory could work with just countable infinities. The latter could for example be compatible with a quantized space-time. In this paper we formulate a simple model of the brain and show that within the presented natural assumptions, the continuum has to exist for at least some physical quantities.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories · Algebraic and Geometric Analysis · Quantum Mechanics and Applications
