Extended Relative Maximum Likelihood Updating of Choquet Beliefs
Xiaoyu Cheng

TL;DR
This paper introduces an Extended Relative Maximum Likelihood (RML) updating rule for convex capacity-based beliefs, unifying classical updating rules like Dempster-Shafer and Fagin-Halpern as special cases.
Contribution
It extends RML updating to convex capacities, providing a unified framework that encompasses classical belief updating rules.
Findings
Extended RML generalizes classical updating rules.
Dempster-Shafer and Fagin-Halpern are special cases of Extended RML.
The framework offers a new approach for belief updating under ambiguity.
Abstract
Cheng(2021) proposes and characterizes Relative Maximum Likelihood (RML) updating rule when the ambiguous beliefs are represented by a set of priors. Relatedly, this note proposes and characterizes Extended RML updating rule when the ambiguous beliefs are represented by a convex capacity. Two classical updating rules for convex capacities, Dempster-Shafer (Shafer, 1976) and Fagin-Halpern rules (Fagin and Halpern, 1990) are included as special cases of Extended RML.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
