Using Proxies to Improve Forecast Evaluation
Hajo Holzmann, Bernhard Klar

TL;DR
This paper explores how using proxies like volatility estimates can enhance the accuracy and power of forecast evaluation methods, especially in high-frequency financial data analysis.
Contribution
It extends robustness results of loss functions to general moments and demonstrates how proxies improve forecast comparison power.
Findings
Proxies increase the power of forecast tests.
Results apply to both conditional and unconditional dominance.
Numerical illustrations confirm theoretical advantages.
Abstract
Comparative evaluation of forecasts of statistical functionals relies on comparing averaged losses of competing forecasts after the realization of the quantity , on which the functional is based, has been observed. Motivated by high-frequency finance, in this paper we investigate how proxies for - say volatility proxies - which are observed together with can be utilized to improve forecast comparisons. We extend previous results on robustness of loss functions for the mean to general moments and ratios of moments, and show in terms of the variance of differences of losses that using proxies will increase the power in comparative forecast tests. These results apply both to testing conditional as well as unconditional dominance. Finally, we numerically illustrate the theoretical results, both for simulated high-frequency data as well as for high-frequency log returns…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFinancial Risk and Volatility Modeling · Stochastic processes and financial applications · Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
