Integrated community occupancy models: A framework to assess occurrence and biodiversity dynamics using multiple data sources

TL;DR

The paper introduces an integrated community occupancy model (ICOM) that combines multiple data sources to improve the accuracy of wildlife occurrence and biodiversity dynamics assessments at both species and community levels.

Contribution

It presents a novel framework that unites data integration and hierarchical community modeling, enhancing inference precision over existing models.

Findings

ICOM improves accuracy and precision of inferences compared to single data source models.

Integration benefits depend on data source quality and replication.

ICOM outperforms single species models in predictive performance.

Abstract

The occurrence and distributions of wildlife populations and communities are shifting as a result of global changes. To evaluate whether these shifts are negatively impacting biodiversity processes, it is critical to monitor the status, trends, and effects of environmental variables on entire communities. However, modeling the dynamics of multiple species simultaneously can require large amounts of diverse data, and few modeling approaches exist to simultaneously provide species and community level inferences. We present an "integrated community occupancy model" (ICOM) that unites principles of data integration and hierarchical community modeling in a single framework to provide inferences on species-specific and community occurrence dynamics using multiple data sources. We use simulations to compare the ICOM to previously developed hierarchical community occupancy models and single species integrated distribution models. We then apply our model to assess the occurrence and biodiversity dynamics of foliage-gleaning birds in the White Mountain National Forest in the northeastern USA from 2010-2018 using three independent data sources. Simulations reveal that integrating multiple data sources in the ICOM increased precision and accuracy of species and community level inferences compared to single data source models, although benefits of integration were dependent on data source quality (e.g., amount of replication). Compared to single species models, the ICOM yielded more precise species-level estimates. Within our case study, the ICOM had the highest out-of-sample predictive performance compared to single species models and models that used only a subset of the three data sources. The ICOM offers an attractive approach to estimate species and biodiversity dynamics, which is additionally valuable to inform management objectives of both individual species and their broader communities.