Optimizing charge-balanced pulse stimulation for desynchronization
Erik T. K. Mau, Michael Rosenblum

TL;DR
This paper develops an optimal pulsatile control method to modulate synchronization levels in populations of oscillators, with applications in neuroscience, by deriving formulas for entropy change and validating them through simulations.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach to optimize pulse shape and timing for desynchronization or synchronization in oscillator populations, considering realistic pulse shapes and natural frequency diversity.
Findings
Derived an expression for entropy change due to stimuli.
Validated theoretical results with numerical simulations.
Identified optimal stimulation parameters for phase control.
Abstract
Collective synchronization in a large population of self-sustained units appears both in natural and engineered systems. Sometimes this effect is in demand, while in some cases, it is undesirable, which calls for control techniques. In this paper, we concentrate on pulsatile control, with the goal to either increase or decrease the level of synchrony. We quantify this level by the entropy of the phase distribution. Motivated by possible applications in neuroscience, we consider pulses of a realistic shape. Exploiting the noisy Kuramoto-Winfree model, we search for the optimal pulse profile and the optimal stimulation phase. For this purpose, we derive an expression for the change of the phase distribution entropy due to the stimulus. We relate this change to the properties of individual units characterized by generally different natural frequencies and phase response curves and the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
