TL;DR
This paper reviews 59 studies on graphical perception to create a shared knowledge base that enhances visualization recommendation systems, addressing inconsistencies and promoting data-driven encoding choices.
Contribution
It compiles a comprehensive JSON dataset from existing literature, facilitating improved automated visualization recommendations and highlighting future research challenges.
Findings
Created a collated dataset of graphical perception studies
Demonstrated how the dataset informs visualization recommendation systems
Identified open challenges in standardizing perception knowledge
Abstract
Selecting appropriate visual encodings is critical to designing effective visualization recommendation systems, yet few findings from graphical perception are typically applied within these systems. We observe two significant limitations in translating graphical perception knowledge into actionable visualization recommendation rules/constraints: inconsistent reporting of findings and a lack of shared data across studies. How can we translate the graphical perception literature into a knowledge base for visualization recommendation? We present a review of 59 papers that study user perception and performance across ten visual analysis tasks. Through this study, we contribute a JSON dataset that collates existing theoretical and experimental knowledge and summarizes key study outcomes in graphical perception. We illustrate how this dataset can inform automated encoding decisions with three…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
