Can the Fe K-alpha Line Reliably Predict Supernova Remnant Progenitors?
Jared Siegel, Vikram V. Dwarkadas (University of Chicago), Kari, A.Frank (CIERA, Northwestern University), David N.Burrows (Pennsylvania State, University)

TL;DR
This study investigates the reliability of using Fe K-alpha line centroid energies from X-ray spectra to determine supernova remnant progenitor types, revealing significant spatial variations that complicate this diagnostic method.
Contribution
The paper provides the first spatially resolved analysis of Fe K-alpha centroid energies in multiple supernova remnants, highlighting the limitations of using the entire remnant spectrum for progenitor classification.
Findings
Fe K-alpha emission detected in 3 out of 6 SNRs
Centroid energies vary spatially within remnants, especially in 3C 397
Using the entire remnant spectrum can misclassify progenitor types
Abstract
The centroid energy of the Fe K line has been used to identify the progenitors of supernova remnants (SNRs). These investigations generally considered the energy of the centroid derived from the spectrum of the entire remnant. Here we use {\it XMM-Newton} data to investigate the Fe K centroid in 6 SNRs: 3C~397, N132D, W49B, DEM L71, 1E 0102.2-7219, and Kes 73. In Kes 73 and 1E 0102.2-7219, we fail to detect any Fe K emission. We report a tentative first detection of Fe K emission in SNR DEM L71, with a centroid energy consistent with its Type Ia designation. In the remaining remnants, the spatial and spectral sensitivity is sufficient to investigate spatial variations of the Fe K centroid. We find in N132D and W49B that the centroids in different regions are consistent with that derived from the overall spectrum, although not necessarily with the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
