Habitual and Reflective Control in Hierarchical Predictive Coding
Paul F. Kinghorn, Beren Millidge, Christopher L. Buckley

TL;DR
This paper proposes that Hierarchical Predictive Coding (HPC) can unify habitual and reflective behaviors within a single framework, explaining how different levels of processing are engaged depending on the task's complexity.
Contribution
It demonstrates that HPC can account for both habitual and deliberative behaviors as a continuum, with hierarchical layers engaged dynamically based on task demands.
Findings
HPC can explain both habitual and reflective control as a continuum.
Higher layers of HPC are recruited only for complex, deliberative actions.
Learning is distributed across the hierarchy, with selective layer engagement.
Abstract
In cognitive science, behaviour is often separated into two types. Reflexive control is habitual and immediate, whereas reflective is deliberative and time consuming. We examine the argument that Hierarchical Predictive Coding (HPC) can explain both types of behaviour as a continuum operating across a multi-layered network, removing the need for separate circuits in the brain. On this view, "fast" actions may be triggered using only the lower layers of the HPC schema, whereas more deliberative actions need higher layers. We demonstrate that HPC can distribute learning throughout its hierarchy, with higher layers called into use only as required.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMental Health Research Topics · Functional Brain Connectivity Studies · Neural dynamics and brain function
