Comparison of Optical Response from DFT Random Phase Approximation and Low-Energy Effective Model: Strained Phosphorene
Mohammad Alidoust, Erlend E. Isachsen, Klaus Halterman, and Jaakko, Akola

TL;DR
This study compares optical response predictions of strained phosphorene using DFT with RPA and a low-energy effective model, highlighting discrepancies and the importance of accurate modeling for optoelectronic applications.
Contribution
It demonstrates the differences between DFT-RPA and a low-energy model in predicting optical properties of strained phosphorene, emphasizing the need to improve RPA methods for reliable electronic predictions.
Findings
Low-strain and low-frequency regimes show agreement between models.
Significant discrepancies in band gap, Drude response, and permittivity features.
Phosphorene can enable programmable perfect absorption in optoelectronic devices.
Abstract
The engineering of the optical response of materials is a paradigm that demands microscopic-level accuracy and reliable predictive theoretical tools. Here we compare and contrast the dispersive permittivity tensor, using both a low-energy effective model and density functional theory (DFT). As a representative material, phosphorene subject to strain is considered. Employing a low-energy model Hamiltonian with a Green's function current-current correlation function, we compute the dynamical optical conductivity and its associated permittivity tensor. For the DFT approach, first-principles calculations make use of the first-order random-phase approximation. Our results reveal that although the two models are generally in agreement within the low-strain and low-frequency regime, the intricate features associated with the fundamental physical properties of the system and optoelectronic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
