Cosmological Constraints from Weak Lensing Peaks: Can Halo Models Accurately Predict Peak Counts?

TL;DR

This study evaluates the accuracy of halo-based models in predicting weak lensing peak counts and finds that non-halo contributions significantly impact cosmological parameter estimation.

Contribution

It demonstrates that halo-only models are insufficient for accurate WL peak predictions, highlighting the need to include non-halo structures for unbiased cosmological inference.

Findings

Halo-only models qualitatively reproduce peak counts but miss negative peaks.

Neglecting non-halo contributions biases cosmological parameters.

Including non-halo structures is essential for unbiased constraints.

Abstract

In order to extract full cosmological information from next-generation large and high-precision weak lensing (WL) surveys (e.g. Euclid, Roman, LSST), higher-order statistics that probe the small-scale, non-linear regime of large scale structure (LSS) need to be utilized. WL peak counts, which trace overdensities in the cosmic web, are one promising and simple statistic for constraining cosmological parameters. The physical origin of WL peaks have previously been linked to dark matter halos along the line of sight and this peak-halo connection has been used to develop various semi-analytic halo-based models for predicting peak counts. Here, we study the origin of WL peaks and the effectiveness of halo-based models for WL peak counts using a suite of ray-tracing N-body simulations. We compare WL peaks in convergence maps from the full simulations to those in maps created from only particles associated with halos -- the latter playing the role of a "perfect" halo model. We find that while halo-only contributions are able to replicate peak counts qualitatively well, halos do not explain all WL peaks. Halos particularly underpredict negative peaks, which are associated with local overdensities in large-scale underdense regions along the line of sight. In addition, neglecting non-halo contributions to peaks counts leads to a significant bias on the parameters ($\Omega_{\rm m}$, $\sigma_{8}$) for surveys larger than $\geq$ 100 deg$^{2}$. We conclude that other elements of the cosmic web, outside and far away from dark matter halos, need to be incorporated into models of WL peaks in order to infer unbiased cosmological constraints.