FADE: FAir Double Ensemble Learning for Observable and Counterfactual Outcomes
Alan Mishler, Edward Kennedy

TL;DR
This paper introduces FADE, a flexible ensemble learning framework that improves fairness and accuracy in predictive models, accommodating multiple fairness criteria and existing benchmarks with theoretical guarantees.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel ensemble method for fair prediction that handles multiple fairness criteria and improves upon existing models without sacrificing accuracy.
Findings
Multiple unfairness measures can be minimized simultaneously with minimal accuracy loss.
The framework provides fast convergence guarantees for estimators.
Application on real and simulated data demonstrates effectiveness in fairness-accuracy tradeoffs.
Abstract
Methods for building fair predictors often involve tradeoffs between fairness and accuracy and between different fairness criteria, but the nature of these tradeoffs varies. Recent work seeks to characterize these tradeoffs in specific problem settings, but these methods often do not accommodate users who wish to improve the fairness of an existing benchmark model without sacrificing accuracy, or vice versa. These results are also typically restricted to observable accuracy and fairness criteria. We develop a flexible framework for fair ensemble learning that allows users to efficiently explore the fairness-accuracy space or to improve the fairness or accuracy of a benchmark model. Our framework can simultaneously target multiple observable or counterfactual fairness criteria, and it enables users to combine a large number of previously trained and newly trained predictors. We provide…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI
