Cognitive science as a source of forward and inverse models of human decisions for robotics and control
Mark K. Ho, Thomas L. Griffiths

TL;DR
This paper reviews how cognitive science offers models of human decision-making that can inform the design of autonomous systems interacting with humans, emphasizing recent advances in theory and methodology.
Contribution
It synthesizes recent developments in cognitive science models of human decisions, highlighting their application to robotics and control systems.
Findings
Cognitive models can serve as forward models of human decision processes.
Inverse models help interpret how humans think about others' decisions.
Recent approaches integrate blackbox and theory-driven modeling techniques.
Abstract
Those designing autonomous systems that interact with humans will invariably face questions about how humans think and make decisions. Fortunately, computational cognitive science offers insight into human decision-making using tools that will be familiar to those with backgrounds in optimization and control (e.g., probability theory, statistical machine learning, and reinforcement learning). Here, we review some of this work, focusing on how cognitive science can provide forward models of human decision-making and inverse models of how humans think about others' decision-making. We highlight relevant recent developments, including approaches that synthesize blackbox and theory-driven modeling, accounts that recast heuristics and biases as forms of bounded optimality, and models that characterize human theory of mind and communication in decision-theoretic terms. In doing so, we aim to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
