A universal relationship between stellar masses and binding energies of galaxies
Yong Shi (NJU), Xiaoling Yu (NJU), Shude Mao (Tsinghua), Qiusheng Gu, (NJU), Xiaoyang Xia (TJNU), Yanmei Chen (NJU)

TL;DR
This paper uncovers a universal correlation between galaxy stellar masses and their binding energies, measured via dynamical velocities and sizes, which is consistent across galaxy types and cosmic time, and may serve as a new distance estimator.
Contribution
It introduces a universal stellar mass-binding energy relation based on a double power law, applicable across diverse galaxy types and evolutionary stages.
Findings
The correlation has a scatter of 0.14 dex in velocity-size product and 0.46 dex in stellar mass.
It holds over nine orders of magnitude in stellar mass and shows little evolution over cosmic time.
A toy model suggests self-regulation between binding energy and supernova feedback can reproduce the observed relation.
Abstract
In this study we demonstrate that stellar masses of galaxies (Mstar) are universally correlated through a double power law function with the product of the dynamical velocities (Ve) and sizes to one-fourth power (Re^0.25) of galaxies, both measured at the effective radii. The product VeRe^0.25 represents the fourth root of the total binding energies within effective radii of galaxies. This stellar mass-binding energy correlation has an observed scatter of 0.14 dex in log(VeRe^0.25) and 0.46 dex in log(Mstar). It holds for a variety of galaxy types over a stellar mass range of nine orders of magnitude, with little evolution over cosmic time. A toy model of self-regulation between binding energies and supernovae feedback is shown to be able to reproduce the observed slopes, but the underlying physical mechanisms are still unclear. The correlation can be a potential distance estimator with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
