TL;DR
This paper introduces the concept of Sustainability of Systematic Literature Reviews (SLR) in software engineering, aiming to reduce effort and increase industrial impact by addressing key problems through a multidimensional approach.
Contribution
It proposes a new sustainability framework for SLR, analyzing existing problems and barriers, and suggests a multidimensional view to make SLR more efficient and industry-relevant.
Findings
Identified 4 major problems and 31 barriers in SLR practices.
Proposed a sustainability framework encompassing social, economic, and technical dimensions.
Aims to reduce time and effort in conducting and updating SLRs.
Abstract
Background: The software engineering community has increasingly conducted systematic literature reviews (SLR) as a means to summarize evidence from different studies and bring to light the state of the art of a given research topic. While SLR provide many benefits, they also present several problems with punctual solutions for some of them. However, two main problems still remain: the high time-/effort-consumption nature of SLR and the lack of an effective impact of SLR results in the industry, as initially expected for SLR. Aims: The main goal of this paper is to introduce a new view - which we name Sustainability of SLR - on how to deal with SLR aiming at reducing those problems. Method: We analyzed six reference studies published in the last decade to identify, group, and analyze the SLR problems and their interconnections. Based on such analysis, we proposed the view of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
