Collaboration in the Time of COVID: A Scientometric Analysis of Multidisciplinary SARS-CoV-2 Research
Eoghan Cunningham, Barry Smyth, Derek Greene

TL;DR
This study analyzes how the COVID-19 pandemic has fostered increased multidisciplinary collaboration in scientific research, leading to smaller, more diverse teams and greater cross-disciplinary integration compared to pre-pandemic research.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive scientometric analysis of over 166,000 COVID-19 articles, revealing increased multidisciplinarity and proposing visualization methods for collaborative networks.
Findings
COVID-19 research teams are smaller than non-COVID teams
COVID-19 research teams are more diverse across disciplines
Increased multidisciplinarity in COVID-19 research across most fields
Abstract
The novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 and the COVID-19 illness it causes have inspired unprecedented levels of multidisciplinary research in an effort to address a generational public health challenge. In this work we conduct a scientometric analysis of COVID-19 research, paying particular attention to the nature of collaboration that this pandemic has fostered among different disciplines. Increased multidisciplinary collaboration has been shown to produce greater scientific impact, albeit with higher co-ordination costs. As such, we consider a collection of over 166,000 COVID-19-related articles to assess the scale and diversity of collaboration in COVID-19 research, which we compare to non-COVID-19 controls before and during the pandemic. We show that COVID-19 research teams are not only significantly smaller than their non-COVID-19 counterparts, but they are also more diverse.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
