A New Lever Function with Adequate Indeterminacy
Shenghui Su, Ping Luo, Shuwang Lv, and Maozhi Xu

TL;DR
This paper introduces a simplified lever function for the REESSE1+ cryptosystem, analyzing its security implications and demonstrating its indeterminacy and resistance to known attacks, thereby enhancing cryptographic robustness.
Contribution
The paper proposes a new lever function with a specific range and sign choices, providing a detailed security analysis and establishing its advantages over previous functions.
Findings
The new lever function is indeterminate and one-to-one.
Constant lever functions are insecure.
The new function resists existing probabilistic attacks.
Abstract
The key transform of the REESSE1+ asymmetrical cryptosystem is Ci = (Ai * W ^ l(i)) ^ d (% M) with l(i) in Omega = {5, 7, ..., 2n + 3} for i = 1, ..., n, where l(i) is called a lever function. In this paper, the authors give a simplified key transform Ci = Ai * W ^ l(i) (% M) with a new lever function l(i) from {1, ..., n} to Omega = {+/-5, +/-6, ..., +/-(n + 4)}, where "+/-" means the selection of the "+" or "-" sign. Discuss the necessity of the new l(i), namely that a simplified private key is insecure if the new l(i) is a constant but not one-to-one function. Further, expound the sufficiency of the new l(i) from four aspects: (1) indeterminacy of the new l(i), (2) insufficient conditions for neutralizing the powers of W and W ^-1 even if Omega = {5, 6, ..., n + 4}, (3) verification by examples, and (4) running times of continued fraction attack and W-parameter intersection attack…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCryptographic Implementations and Security · Coding theory and cryptography · Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
