Replacing quarantine of COVID-19 contacts with periodic testing is also effective in mitigating the risk of transmission
Patricio Foncea, Susana Mondschein, Marcelo Olivares

TL;DR
This study uses a simulation model to show that periodic testing of COVID-19 contacts can effectively replace quarantine, reducing transmission risk even with limited testing resources and imperfect adherence.
Contribution
It introduces a simulation-based evaluation of sequential testing as an alternative to quarantine, highlighting cost-effective testing strategies for COVID-19 contact tracing.
Findings
Two LFA tests can match 14-day quarantine effectiveness with high adherence.
Adding a third test achieves the same reduction as a full 14-day quarantine.
Results are robust across different viral load models and test sensitivities.
Abstract
The quarantine of identified close contacts has been vital to reducing transmission rates and averting secondary infection risk before symptom onset and by asymptomatic cases. The effectiveness of this contact tracing strategy to mitigate transmission is sensitive to the adherence to quarantines, which may be lower for longer quarantine periods or in vaccinated populations (where perceptions of risk are reduced). This study develops a simulation model to evaluate contact tracing strategies based on the sequential testing of identified contacts after exposure as an alternative to quarantines, in which contacts are isolated only after confirmation by a positive test. The analysis considers different number and types of tests (PCR and lateral flow antigen tests (LFA)) to identify the cost-effective testing policies that minimize the expected infecting days post-exposure considering…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
