Background for the Self Consistent Renormalisation (SCR) Theory
Bharathiganesh Devanarayanan, Akariti Sharma, Alpesh Sheth, Prafulla, K. Jha, Navinder Singh

TL;DR
This paper reviews the development of the SCR theory for itinerant magnetism, highlighting its improvements over Stoner and RPA theories by incorporating correlation effects to better explain magnetic phenomena.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive background on SCR theory, explaining its mathematical framework and how it addresses limitations of previous theories in itinerant magnetism.
Findings
SCR theory successfully explains weakly and nearly ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic materials.
It improves upon Stoner and RPA theories by including correlation effects.
The mathematical complexity of SCR is discussed in detail.
Abstract
A detailed review is given on the evolution of the theory of itinerant magnetism. The self-consistent renormalization (SCR) theory is quite successful in addressing the phenomenon of itinerant magnetism in weakly and nearly ferromagnetic and anti-ferromagnetic materials. It goes beyond the Stoner and random phase approximation (RPA) theories in taking the correlation effects into account. The Mathematical machinery of the SCR theory is rather complicated. The aim of these notes is to provide the required background. The problems with Stoner and RPA theory are discussed and the way in which the SCR theory rectifies those problems is also discussed.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRare-earth and actinide compounds · Organic and Molecular Conductors Research · Advanced Condensed Matter Physics
