Identifying rote learning and the supporting effects of hints in drills
Gunnar Stefansson, Anna Helga Jonsdottir, Thorarinn Jonmundsson, Gylfi, Snaer Sigurdsson, Ingunn Lilja Bergsdottir

TL;DR
This study analyzes how hints in an online drilling system influence students' ability to distinguish between rote memorization and meaningful learning, showing hints aid especially students with lower performance.
Contribution
It introduces a method to differentiate rote from meaningful learning in an online drill system and evaluates the impact of hints on student learning behaviors.
Findings
Students perform better with familiar answer options, indicating some rote learning.
Hints are especially effective for students with lower performance.
Deeper learning is observed alongside rote learning in the system.
Abstract
Whenever students use any drilling system the question arises how much of their learning is meaningful learning vs memorisation through repetition or rote learning. Although both types of learning have their place in an educational system it is important to be able to distinguish between these two approaches to learning and identify options which can dislodge students from rote learning and motivate them towards meaningful learning. The tutor-web is an online drilling system. The design aim of the system is learning rather than evaluation. This is done by presenting students with multiple-choice questions which are selected randomly but linked to the students' performance. The questions themselves can be generated for a specific topic by drawing correct and incorrect answers from a collection associated with a general problem statement or heading. With this generating process students…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
