Small Sample Limit of the Bennett Acceptance Ratio Method and the Variationally Derived Intermediates
Martin Reinhardt, Helmut Grubm\"uller

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the performance of Bennett Acceptance Ratio (BAR) and Variationally Derived Intermediates (VI) methods in free energy calculations with very few samples, revealing their limitations and providing guidelines for estimator choice.
Contribution
It demonstrates that BAR and VI are suboptimal with small sample sizes and derives a universal relation between sample number and state overlap, guiding estimator selection.
Findings
VI becomes optimal with fewer than seven samples per state
BAR requires increasing samples as state overlap decreases
Universal inverse power law relates sample number to state overlap
Abstract
Free energy calculations based on atomistic Hamiltonians provide microscopic insight into the thermodynamic driving forces of biophysical or condensed matter systems. Many approaches use intermediate Hamiltonians interpolating between the two states for which the free energy difference is calculated. The Bennett Acceptance Ratio (BAR) and Variationally Derived Intermediates (VI) methods are optimal estimator and intermediate states in that the mean-squared error of free energy calculations based on independent sampling is minimized. However, BAR and VI have been derived based on several approximations that do not hold for very few sample points. Analyzing one-dimensional test systems we show that in such cases BAR and VI are suboptimal and that established uncertainty estimates are inaccurate. Whereas for VI to become optimal less than seven samples per state suffice in all cases, for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
