Dynamics of Wealth Inequality in Simple Artificial Societies
John C. Stevenson

TL;DR
This paper presents a simple generative model demonstrating how wealth inequality naturally emerges in artificial societies, influenced by dynamics, reproduction costs, and evolutionary pressures, with implications for understanding inequality's origins.
Contribution
It introduces a generative model showing how wealth inequality arises from agent interactions and dynamics, highlighting the role of non-equilibrium states and evolutionary factors.
Findings
Wealth inequality emerges from identical agents in a simple foraging model.
Non-equilibrium regimes exhibit the highest inequality levels.
Reproduction costs influence the extent of inequality.
Abstract
A simple generative model of a foraging society generates significant wealth inequalities from identical agents on an equal opportunity landscape. These inequalities arise in both equilibrium and non-equilibrium regimes with some societies essentially never reaching equilibrium. Reproduction costs mitigate inequality beyond their affect on intrinsic growth rate. The highest levels of inequality are found during non-equilibrium regimes. Inequality in dynamic regimes is driven by factors different than those driving steady state inequality. Evolutionary pressures drive the intrinsic growth rate as high as possible, leading to a tragedy of the commons.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEvolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
