Central kinematics of the Galactic globular cluster M80
Fabian G\"ottgens, Sebastian Kamann, Holger Baumgardt, Stefan, Dreizler, Benjamin Giesers, Tim-Oliver Husser, Mark den Brok, Romain, F\'etick, Davor Krajnovi\'c, Peter M. Weilbacher

TL;DR
This study uses advanced spectroscopic data to analyze the central kinematics of globular cluster M80, exploring the potential presence of an intermediate-mass black hole and the cluster's dynamical state.
Contribution
It provides new integral-field spectroscopic measurements of M80's core, compares models with and without an IMBH, and discusses the cluster's black hole content and stellar dynamics.
Findings
Two possible cluster centers with different implications for IMBH presence.
Support for an IMBH of about 4600 solar masses in one solution.
Evidence that M80 has lost nearly all stellar-mass black holes.
Abstract
We use spectra observed with the integral-field spectrograph MUSE to reveal the central kinematics of the Galactic globular cluster Messier 80 (M80, NGC 6093). Using observations obtained with the recently commissioned narrow-field mode of MUSE, we are able to analyse 932 stars in the central 7.5 arcsec by 7.5 arcsec of the cluster for which no useful spectra previously existed. Mean radial velocities of individual stars derived from the spectra are compared to predictions from axisymmetric Jeans models, resulting in radial profiles of the velocity dispersion, the rotation amplitude, and the mass-to-light ratio. The new data allow us to search for an intermediate-mass black hole (IMBH) in the centre of the cluster. Our Jeans model finds two similarly probable solutions around different dynamical cluster centres. The first solution has a centre close to the photometric estimates…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
