Fast multi-qubit gates through simultaneous two-qubit gates
Xiu Gu, Jorge Fern\'andez-Pend\'as, Pontus Vikst{\aa}l, Tahereh Abad,, Christopher Warren, Andreas Bengtsson, Giovanna Tancredi, Vitaly Shumeiko,, Jonas Bylander, G\"oran Johansson, Anton Frisk Kockum

TL;DR
This paper introduces a method to implement multi-qubit gates efficiently by applying multiple two-qubit gates simultaneously, enhancing quantum circuit depth and fidelity without hardware modifications.
Contribution
It presents a novel approach to realize multi-qubit gates through simultaneous two-qubit gates, applicable on current quantum hardware, improving speed and fidelity.
Findings
Multi-qubit gates can be realized by simultaneous two-qubit gates.
These gates are as fast or faster than individual two-qubit gates.
Numerical simulations show >99% fidelity in current hardware.
Abstract
Near-term quantum computers are limited by the decoherence of qubits to only being able to run low-depth quantum circuits with acceptable fidelity. This severely restricts what quantum algorithms can be compiled and implemented on such devices. One way to overcome these limitations is to expand the available gate set from single- and two-qubit gates to multi-qubit gates, which entangle three or more qubits in a single step. Here, we show that such multi-qubit gates can be realized by the simultaneous application of multiple two-qubit gates to a group of qubits where at least one qubit is involved in two or more of the two-qubit gates. Multi-qubit gates implemented in this way are as fast as, or sometimes even faster than, the constituent two-qubit gates. Furthermore, these multi-qubit gates do not require any modification of the quantum processor, but are ready to be used in current…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
