Can a Humorous Conversational Agent Enhance Learning Experience and Outcomes?
Jessy Ceha, Ken Jen Lee, Elizabeth Nilsen, Joslin Goh, Edith Law

TL;DR
This study investigates how different types of humor used by a conversational agent affect learners' motivation, effort, and enjoyment during a teaching task, revealing that affiliative humor boosts motivation but self-defeating humor may reduce enjoyment.
Contribution
It introduces the use of affiliative and self-defeating humor in pedagogical agents and examines their distinct impacts on learner perceptions and attitudes.
Findings
Affiliative humor increases learner motivation and effort.
Self-defeating humor enhances effort but reduces enjoyment.
Understanding learner characteristics is crucial for effective humor use.
Abstract
Previous studies have highlighted the benefits of pedagogical conversational agents using socially-oriented conversation with students. In this work, we examine the effects of a conversational agent's use of affiliative and self-defeating humour -- considered conducive to social well-being and enhancing interpersonal relationships -- on learners' perception of the agent and attitudes towards the task. Using a between-subjects protocol, 58 participants taught a conversational agent about rock classification using a learning-by-teaching platform, the Curiosity Notebook. While all agents were curious and enthusiastic, the style of humour was manipulated such that the agent either expressed an affiliative style, a self-defeating style, or no humour. Results demonstrate that affiliative humour can significantly increase motivation and effort, while self-defeating humour, although enhancing…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
