Types of connectedness of the constructive real number intervals
Viktor Chernov

TL;DR
This paper explores various notions of connectedness in constructive metric spaces, revealing that the constructive real interval's connectedness depends on the specific definitions used, unlike in classical topology.
Contribution
It analyzes different constructive connectedness notions, showing their non-equivalence and impact on the connectedness of the constructive real interval.
Findings
Connectedness depends on the chosen definition in constructive spaces.
The constructive real interval's connectedness varies with different notions.
Classical equivalences do not hold in the constructive setting.
Abstract
We study different notions of connected constructive metric spaces. They differ the types of connected components and how different components relate to each other. These notions are equivalent in classical point set topology but they give differ in the constructive world. In particular the interval of constructive real number appears to be connected if we use some of the definitions of a connected space and it is not connected when we use other definitions. This study is the continuation of the previous work of the author inspired by the question of Andrej Bauer about properties of locally constant functions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Logic, programming, and type systems · Numerical Methods and Algorithms
