Improvement of a Prediction Model for Heart Failure Survival through Explainable Artificial Intelligence
Pedro A. Moreno-Sanchez

TL;DR
This paper presents an explainability-driven approach to select and evaluate a heart failure survival prediction model that balances accuracy with interpretability, aiding clinical decision-making.
Contribution
It introduces a method combining ensemble algorithms and explainability techniques to improve the interpretability of heart failure survival predictions.
Findings
The best model uses an Extra Trees classifier with 5 features.
Achieves 85.1% balanced accuracy on cross-validation.
Follow-up time is the most influential feature.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases and their associated disorder of heart failure are one of the major death causes globally, being a priority for doctors to detect and predict its onset and medical consequences. Artificial Intelligence (AI) allows doctors to discover clinical indicators and enhance their diagnosis and treatments. Specifically, explainable AI offers tools to improve the clinical prediction models that experience poor interpretability of their results. This work presents an explainability analysis and evaluation of a prediction model for heart failure survival by using a dataset that comprises 299 patients who suffered heart failure. The model employs a data workflow pipeline able to select the best ensemble tree algorithm as well as the best feature selection technique. Moreover, different post-hoc techniques have been used for the explainability analysis of the model. The paper's…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsFeature Selection
