Quantification of intrinsic quality of a principal dimension in correspondence analysis and taxicab correspondence analysis
Vartan Choulakian

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel approach to assess the intrinsic quality of principal dimensions in correspondence analysis and taxicab correspondence analysis, addressing interpretability and quantification issues.
Contribution
It proposes a new framework based on residual signs and quantifications to evaluate the intrinsic quality of dimensions, enhancing interpretability and structure detection.
Findings
Intrinsic quality quantification improves interpretability.
Residual analysis uncovers structure in sparse tables.
Method enhances understanding of dependence and heterogeneity.
Abstract
Collins(2002, 2011) raised a number of issues with regards to correspondence analysis (CA), such as: qualitative information in a CA map versus quantitative information in the relevant contingency table; the interpretation of a CA map is difficult and its relation with the \% of inertia (variance) explained. We tackle these issues by considering CA and taxicab CA (TCA) as a stepwise Hotelling/Tucker decomposition of the cross-covariance matrix of the row and column categories into four quadrants. The contents of this essay are: First, we review the notion of quality/quantity in multidimensional data analysis as discussed by Benz\'{e}cri, who based his reflections on Aristotle. Second, we show the importance of unravelling the interrelated concepts of dependence/heterogeneity structure in a contingency table; and to picture them two maps are needed. Third, we distinguish between…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
