TL;DR
This paper introduces XQLFW, a new benchmark dataset derived from LFW, designed to evaluate face recognition performance across varying image qualities and resolutions in realistic, unconstrained environments.
Contribution
The paper presents a standardized, realistic dataset and evaluation protocol for cross-resolution face recognition, highlighting the limitations of existing models in handling quality variations.
Findings
Models perform inconsistently across different image qualities.
Performance on LFW does not predict cross-quality robustness.
Deep models trained for cross-resolution show varying susceptibility to image quality.
Abstract
Real-world face recognition applications often deal with suboptimal image quality or resolution due to different capturing conditions such as various subject-to-camera distances, poor camera settings, or motion blur. This characteristic has an unignorable effect on performance. Recent cross-resolution face recognition approaches used simple, arbitrary, and unrealistic down- and up-scaling techniques to measure robustness against real-world edge-cases in image quality. Thus, we propose a new standardized benchmark dataset and evaluation protocol derived from the famous Labeled Faces in the Wild (LFW). In contrast to previous derivatives, which focus on pose, age, similarity, and adversarial attacks, our Cross-Quality Labeled Faces in the Wild (XQLFW) maximizes the quality difference. It contains only more realistic synthetically degraded images when necessary. Our proposed dataset is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
