Towards Explainable Fact Checking
Isabelle Augenstein

TL;DR
This paper discusses the development of automatic fact checking methods, emphasizing the importance of explainability in deep learning models used for verifying claims amidst rising misinformation.
Contribution
It introduces initial solutions for explainable fact checking and proposes general machine learning approaches for NLP tasks with limited labeled data.
Findings
Proposed initial methods for explainable fact checking.
Developed machine learning solutions for low-resource NLP tasks.
Addressed the need for transparency in automated fact verification.
Abstract
The past decade has seen a substantial rise in the amount of mis- and disinformation online, from targeted disinformation campaigns to influence politics, to the unintentional spreading of misinformation about public health. This development has spurred research in the area of automatic fact checking, from approaches to detect check-worthy claims and determining the stance of tweets towards claims, to methods to determine the veracity of claims given evidence documents. These automatic methods are often content-based, using natural language processing methods, which in turn utilise deep neural networks to learn higher-order features from text in order to make predictions. As deep neural networks are black-box models, their inner workings cannot be easily explained. At the same time, it is desirable to explain how they arrive at certain decisions, especially if they are to be used for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopic Modeling · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Software Engineering Research
