Exploring Biases and Prejudice of Facial Synthesis via Semantic Latent Space
Xuyang Shen, Jo Plested, Sabrina Caldwell, Tom Gedeon

TL;DR
This paper investigates biases in facial synthesis models, identifying causes related to training data and model architecture, and proposes methods to reduce bias, emphasizing the importance of dataset composition and model optimization.
Contribution
It reveals how training data proportions and model architecture influence bias in facial synthesis, and suggests strategies to mitigate bias effectively.
Findings
Biased data leads to biased face generation.
Adjusting training data proportions affects bias levels.
Optimizing model architecture reduces bias.
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) models are widely used to provide a more convenient and smarter life. However, biased algorithms will negatively influence us. For instance, groups targeted by biased algorithms will feel unfairly treated and even fearful of negative consequences of these biases. This work targets biased generative models' behaviors, identifying the cause of the biases and eliminating them. We can (as expected) conclude that biased data causes biased predictions of face frontalization models. Varying the proportions of male and female faces in the training data can have a substantial effect on behavior on the test data: we found that the seemingly obvious choice of 50:50 proportions was not the best for this dataset to reduce biased behavior on female faces, which was 71% unbiased as compared to our top unbiased rate of 84%. Failure in generation and generating incorrect gender faces…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFace recognition and analysis · Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis · Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
