Towards an Elementary Formulation of the Riemann Hypothesis in Terms of Permutation Groups
Will Cavendish, Jacob Tsimerman

TL;DR
This paper explores a permutation group-based inequality related to the Riemann hypothesis, showing it holds if the hypothesis is true and providing conditions for its potential converse.
Contribution
It introduces a new formulation of the Riemann hypothesis using permutation groups and advances understanding of its equivalence through group-theoretic inequalities.
Findings
Proves the inequality g(n) ≤ e^{√p_n} under the Riemann hypothesis
Shows that if the Riemann hypothesis is false, the inequality can be violated for some n
Links the inequality to the distribution of zeros of the Riemann zeta function
Abstract
This paper investigates the relationship between the Riemann hypothesis and the statement , where is the maximum order of an element of , the symmetric group on elements, and is the -th prime. We show this inequality holds under the Riemann Hypothesis. We also make progress towards establishing the converse by proving if the Riemann Hypothesis is false and the supremum of the set of the real parts of the Riemann zeta function's zeros is not equal to 1.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAnalytic Number Theory Research · Mathematics and Applications · History and Theory of Mathematics
