The origins of low-luminosity supernovae: the case of SN 2016bkv
Maxime Deckers, Jose H. Groh, Ioana Boian, Eoin J. Farrell (Trinity, College Dublin, the University of Dublin)

TL;DR
This study models the progenitor of low-luminosity supernova SN 2016bkv, suggesting it likely evolved through binary interaction rather than as a single star, and provides insights into its mass-loss and composition.
Contribution
It offers the first detailed radiative transfer modeling of SN 2016bkv, constraining its progenitor's properties and evolutionary history, emphasizing binary interaction scenarios.
Findings
Progenitor had a mass-loss rate of (6.0 +- 2.0) x 1e-4 Msun/yr.
Progenitor's surface abundances are consistent with solar He and CNO.
Pre-explosion mass estimated between 10-20 Msun, favoring lower values.
Abstract
We investigate the low-luminosity supernova SN 2016bkv and its peculiar early-time interaction. For that, we compute radiative transfer models using the CMFGEN code. Because SN 2016bkv shows signs of interaction with material expelled by its progenitor, it offers a great opportunity to constrain the uncertain evolutionary channels leading to low-luminosity supernovae. Our models indicate that the progenitor had a mass-loss rate of (6.0 +- 2.0) x 1e-4 Msun/yr (assuming a velocity of 150 km/s). The surface abundances of the progenitor are consistent with solar contents of He and CNO. If SN 2016bkv's progenitor evolved as a single star, it was an odd red supergiant that did not undergo the expected dredge up for some reason. We propose that the progenitor more likely evolved through binary interaction. One possibility is that the primary star accreted unprocessed material from a companion…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
