K2, Spitzer, and TESS Transits of Four Sub-Neptune Exoplanets
Alison Duck, Caleb K. Harada, Justin Harrell, Ryan R. A. Morris,, Edward Williams, Ian Crossfield, Michael Werner, Drake Deming

TL;DR
This study combines K2, Spitzer, and TESS data to refine the orbital and physical parameters of four sub-Neptune exoplanets, improving period precision and confirming radii despite challenges in validation.
Contribution
The paper presents a joint analysis methodology that enhances orbital period accuracy and confirms planetary radii by combining multi-mission photometry, despite limitations in transit validation.
Findings
Improved orbital period precision by over an order of magnitude.
Confirmed planetary radii through joint K2 and Spitzer analysis.
Reduced transit time uncertainties to 8-23 minutes, aiding future JWST observations.
Abstract
We present new Spitzer transit observations of four K2 transiting sub-Neptunes: K2-36c, K2-79b, K2-167b, and K2-212b. We derive updated orbital ephemerides and radii for these planets based on a joint analysis of the Spitzer, TESS, and K2 photometry. We use the EVEREST pipeline to provide improved K2 photometry, by detrending instrumental noise and K2's pointing jitter. We used a pixel level decorrelation method on the Spitzer observations to reduce instrumental systematic effects. We modeled the effect of possible blended eclipsing binaries, seeking to validate these planets via the achromaticity of the transits (K2 versus Spitzer). However, we find that Spitzer's signal-to-noise ratio for these small planets is insufficient to validate them via achromaticity. Nevertheless, by jointly fitting radii between K2 and Spitzer observations, we were able to independently confirm the K2 radius…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
