Uncertainty in Climate Science: Not Cause for Inaction
Juan M. Restrepo, Michael E. Mann

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that Earth's climate is non-stationary with a rising mean during the Industrial Era, and shows that uncertainties do not negate the clear evidence of anthropogenic global warming.
Contribution
It introduces a simple stochastic climate model that captures natural and anthropogenic forcings, confirming the robustness of observed global warming despite uncertainties.
Findings
Climate distribution is non-stationary with a rising mean.
Uncertainties in the model are insufficient to obscure the observed warming.
Natural variability cannot explain the current temperature rise.
Abstract
Using observational data and an elementary rigorous statistical fact it is easily shown that the distribution of Earth's climate is non-stationary. Examination of records of hundreds of local Industrial Era temperature histories in the Northern Hemisphere were used to show this fact. Statistically, the mean of the ensemble has been rising during the Industrial Era. All of this confirms what climate scientists already know. The issue of predictions under uncertainties was tackled as well: a simple balance model was tuned to track an ensemble of climate records. Stochastic parametrizations were created to capture natural and anthropogenic CO2 forcings. The resulting stochastic model was then tested against historical data and then used to make future predictions. This exercise confirmed as well climate science attribution to significant global warming during the Industrial Era to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics · Climate variability and models · Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
