The effect of the number of distractors and the "None of the above" - "All of the above" options in multiple choice questions
Anna Helga Jonsdottir, Thorarinn Jonmundsson, Inga Huld Armann, Birna, Borg Gunnarsdottir, Gunnar Stefansson

TL;DR
This study investigates how the number of distractors and the inclusion of 'None of the above' or 'All of the above' options affect student performance on multiple choice questions in online assessments.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence on how distractor count and specific options influence correctness rates in MCQs, using data from a large online course.
Findings
Correct answer probability highest with 'All of the above' as distractor
Correct answer probability lowest when 'None of the above' or 'All of the above' are used
More distractors decrease the likelihood of correct responses
Abstract
Multiple choice questions (MCQs) are commonly used for assessment in higher education. With increased use of on-line examination it is likely that the usage of MCQs will be even more in years to come. It is therefore of interest to examine some characteristics of these type of questions such as the effect of the number of distractors used and the "None of the above" (NOTA) or "All of the above" (AOTA) options. The tutor-web is an open-source, on-line drilling system that is freely available to anyone having access to the Internet. The system was designed to be used for teaching mathematics and statistics but can in principle be used for other subjects as well. The system offers thousands of multiple choice questions at high school and university level. In addition to be a tool used by students for learning it has also been used as a testbed for research on web-assisted education.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
