Unseen facts due to the statistical derivation of the Bell inequality and their logical consequences

TL;DR

This paper demonstrates that the Bell inequality can be derived purely from algebraic principles without assuming locality or hidden variables, revealing unseen facts and logical consequences in quantum data analysis.

Contribution

It shows that the Bell inequality's derivation is independent of physical assumptions and can be obtained from algebraic principles, challenging traditional interpretations.

Findings

Bell inequality derived from algebra alone

Bell inequality satisfied by deterministic and random data

Quantum probabilities do not violate the algebraic Bell inequality

Abstract

The Bell inequality is derived under the assumption of three physical data sets, random or deterministic. The data sets represent a laboratory realization of the three probability based variables used by Bell. For physical data as can be written on paper, the derivation of the inequality results only from principles of algebra and is independent of assumptions of locality, hidden variables and even randomness. Cross correlations of thee data sets carried out as Bell correlated three random variables results in the same inequality that is identically satisfied even by deterministic data. However, to obtain three data sets on two particles destroyed by measurement, two experimental runs are required, followed by data matching to reduce four data sets to three. If quantum mechanical probabilities are used to describe the data frequencies, the Bell inequality is satisfied. The situation is analogous to performing two sets of coin flips to compare the effect of two different coin loadings on the probabilities for heads and tails.