User configurable 3D object regeneration for spatial privacy

TL;DR

This paper presents a method using 3D object regeneration with adversarial autoencoders to enhance spatial privacy in AR/MR applications by transforming point clouds before sharing, balancing privacy and utility.

Contribution

It introduces a configurable 3D object transformation framework that variably controls privacy levels in point clouds for AR/MR environments.

Findings

Privacy can be effectively increased by adjusting the privilege level.

High intra-class privacy and utility are achievable within specific privilege ranges.

The method maintains privacy while preserving utility for third-party applications.

Abstract

Environmental understanding capability of $\textit{augmented}$ (AR) and $\textit{mixed reality}$ (MR) devices are continuously improving through advances in sensing, computer vision, and machine learning. Various AR/MR applications demonstrate such capabilities i.e. scanning a space using a handheld or head mounted device and capturing a digital representation of the space that are accurate copies of the real space. However, these capabilities impose privacy risks to users: personally identifiable information can leak from captured 3D maps of the sensitive spaces and/or captured sensitive objects within the mapped space. Thus, in this work, we demonstrate how we can leverage 3D object regeneration for preserving privacy of 3D point clouds. That is, we employ an intermediary layer of protection to transform the 3D point cloud before providing it to the third-party applications. Specifically, we use an existing adversarial autoencoder to generate copies of 3D objects where the likeness of the copies from the original can be varied. To test the viability and performance of this method as a privacy preserving mechanism, we use a 3D classifier to classify and identify these transformed point clouds i.e. perform $\textit{super}$-class and $\textit{intra}$-class classification. To measure the performance of the proposed privacy framework, we define privacy, $\Pi\in[0,1]$, and utility metrics, $Q\in[0,1]$, which are desired to be maximized. Experimental evaluation shows that the privacy framework can indeed variably effect the privacy of a 3D object by varying the privilege level $l\in[0,1]$ i.e. if a low $l<0.17$ is maintained, $\Pi_1,\Pi_2>0.4$ is ensured where $\Pi_1,\Pi_2$ are super- and intra-class privacy. Lastly, the privacy framework can ensure relatively high intra-class privacy and utility i.e. $\Pi_2>0.63$ and $Q>0.70$, if the privilege level is kept within the range of $0.17<l<0.25$.